California’s Pure Comparative Negligence System California follows what is known as pure comparative negligence, a rule established by the state Supreme Court in Li v. Yellow Cab Co. back in 1975. Under this system, an injured person can recover damages even if they were mostly responsible for the accident, with their award simply reduced by…
DetailsA recent California verdict put workplace sexual harassment back in the headlines. It also offered a clear reminder of what state law protects and what employers owe the people who work for them. For anyone facing similar treatment on the job, the outcome carries practical lessons. What the Jury Decided In February 2026, a San…
DetailsWorkplace sexual harassment raises urgent questions for people who are often already dealing with a stressful and uncomfortable situation. Here are answers to what clients ask most often when they first consider taking action. What Actually Counts as Sexual Harassment at Work? California law recognizes two broad categories. Quid pro quo harassment involves job benefits…
DetailsA guilty plea has closed one chapter in a case that drew national attention. In May 2026, the man responsible for the death of Paul Kessler admitted to felony charges tied to a 2023 confrontation in Thousand Oaks. The outcome offers a clear look at how a single blow can carry both criminal and civil…
DetailsE-bike accidents raise legal questions that do not always come up in a typical car crash case, mostly because e-bikes occupy a strange middle ground between bicycles and motor vehicles under California law. Here are answers to what clients ask most often after this kind of crash. Are E-Bikes Legal to Ride Like Regular Bicycles…
DetailsWatching another driver speed away after causing a crash leaves victims with a uniquely frustrating problem. There is no other insurance policy to call, no other driver to identify at the scene, and often no clear starting point for figuring out what comes next. Why Drivers Flee in the First Place Drivers leave the scene…
DetailsMost people assume an injury claim comes down to one driver, one property owner, or one company at fault. In reality, a surprising number of cases involve more than a single responsible party, and identifying all of them can significantly change how much compensation is actually available. Why Looking Beyond the Obvious Party Matters Insurance…
DetailsOne of the most important things to understand about a California medical malpractice case is that time is genuinely limited. Unlike some civil claims where the deadline feels distant, the statute of limitations for medical malpractice in California is shorter than most people expect, and missing it almost always means losing the right to recover…
DetailsPatients place considerable trust in their physicians. When a medical provider violates that trust, the consequences can be lasting and severe. A recent Los Angeles case involving a former Woodland Hills physician illustrates both the gravity of that harm and the way the legal system holds offenders accountable. A Woodland Hills Doctor Held Accountable According…
DetailsAfter a car accident in Westlake Village, the question of who was at fault shapes everything that follows. It determines how insurance claims are handled, what compensation is available, and how much each party ultimately bears responsibility for the losses the accident produced. California’s approach to fault in car accident cases involves a combination of…
Details
